Introduce a better syntax for single resource allocation
This commit is contained in:
parent
40f67b4bd7
commit
1fdb80e633
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#define WITH99_MAJOR 2
|
||||
#define WITH99_MINOR 0
|
||||
#define WITH99_MINOR 1
|
||||
#define WITH99_PATCH 0
|
||||
|
||||
#define WITH99_VERSION_COMPATIBLE(x, y, z) (WITH99_MAJOR == (x) && ((WITH99_MINOR == (y) && WITH99_PATCH >= (z)) || (WITH99_MINOR > (y))))
|
||||
@ -55,7 +55,19 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#define WITH99_With(...) ML99_EVAL(WITH99_with(v(__VA_ARGS__)))
|
||||
|
||||
#define WITH99_priv_multiple(...) ML99_variadicsForEach(v(WITH99_priv_create_stmt), v(__VA_ARGS__))
|
||||
|
||||
#define WITH99_with(...) ML99_call(WITH99_with, __VA_ARGS__)
|
||||
#define WITH99_with_IMPL(...) ML99_variadicsForEach(v(WITH99_priv_create_stmt), v(__VA_ARGS__))
|
||||
#define WITH99_with_IMPL(...) \
|
||||
ML99_appl(\
|
||||
ML99_if(\
|
||||
ML99_isTuple(ML99_variadicsGet(0)(v(__VA_ARGS__))),\
|
||||
ML99_compose(ML99_appl(v(ML99_variadicsForEach), v(WITH99_priv_create_stmt)), v(ML99_untuple)),\
|
||||
v(WITH99_priv_create_stmt)\
|
||||
),\
|
||||
ML99_tuple(v(__VA_ARGS__))\
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user